The 4th International Laboratory for the History of Science
Art, Science and Techniques of Drafting in the Renaissance
24 May - 1 June 2001
Florence and Vinci, Italy

Organized by Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza


The theory and practice of vision in Leonardo and his followers
Coordinator: Prof. Carlo Pedretti


WEDNESDAY, MAY 30 2001

"Corpo nato della prospettiva di Leonardo Vinci, discepolo della sperienza. Sia fatto questo corpo sanza esemplo d'alcuno corpo ma solamente con semplici linee" (Body born of the perspective of Leonardo da Vinci, disciple of experience. Let this body be made without relation to any body, but out of simple lines only).
A revealing pentimento shows that Leonardo was about to write "of any solid body", that is, geometrical body, and in fact the drawing recalls the mazzocchi of the earlier perspectivists. But his intention was to depart from the fifteenth-century tradition of mazzocchio perspective to investigate the dynamic qualities of a continuous line in space, a concept that will be visually underlined in much later treatises on perspective, e.g. in Barbaro's of 1569 and in Sirigatti's of 1596. The same principle of perspective was to be fully exploited in his later drawings of water currents, as well as in his anatomical representations of 1505-1510, drawn from a model in which muscles are reduced to wires to indicate their lines of force. The dynamic quality inherent in a spiral or coiling form is reflected even in his drawings of machines for the excavation of canals, which date from the first years of the sixteenth century.

The group meets to look first at the Codex Atlanticus sheet of c. 1490 on which Leonardo draws a serpent-like object in perspective with the note to it quoted above. It is a sheet full of sketches and diagrams of perspective, including a puzzling view of the terrestrial globe - a sheet dense of questions yet to be asked, a document of Leonardo's indebtedness to tradition - Optics and Cartography - and a symbol of his innovative views on scientific investigation. The time is that of his Proems in praise of Nature and Experience, the science for him so seldom reborn (Galluzzi). This abstract body in perspective - its shape and meaning to be fully explained during the meeting - is suitable for computer-graphic animation and could well be translated into a tridimensional model just like the models of Luca Pacioli's Divina proportione. It would be a most appropriate, meaningful symbol of the whole workshop.
And there is more to it. Every line of this body betrays its origin from a point that moves in space to generate it (late in life Leonardo defines the perspective of the horizon line in the same way), and therefore to represent form as volume, thus making visible in the viewer's mind even that which cannot be seen - the back of the object. It is Leonardo's answer to Parrasio's challenge in antiquity as related by Pliny and as mentioned in passing by Alberti. This may have something to do with a lost manuscript page by Leonardo described by Delacroix in 1849.
Alberti, of course, is Leonardo's initial instigator. Paris Ms. A, containing the bulk of Leonardo's earliest notes for his Book on Painting, c. 1490-1492, also contains a full commentary on Alberti's so-called "costruzione legittima" of artificial perspective. This is something well known but still little understood, particularly in view of a conflict that was soon to arise from Leonardo's need to take into account Optics in the traditional sense, possibly through a first exposure to Ghiberti's Commentari, though there is now evidence of an even earlier exposure to the mathematical principles of Euclid's Optics and even of Ptolemy's Cosmology (Sinisgalli). And Leonardo himself, in Ms. A, refers to his own book on perspective as a treatise already compiled. Again at an early date Leonardo illustrates the use of the "bacolo di Euclide" that Gerson and others were later to apply to astronomical observation. (It may become necessary to consider the astrolabe in relation to perspective and surveying for cartography, to explain, for instance, Leonardo's reference to Sirigatti and his "orologio anello". This may also lead into a discussion of the most complex problem of sundials, etc.)

The introductory session to the Leonardo workshop should place an emphasis on Leonardo's experimentation through models. The first day is an introduction, or rather a fully discussed survey of the highlights of Leonardo perspective studies in chronological sequence, through the 1490s and up to 1518.