| The 4th International
Laboratory for the History of Science Art, Science and Techniques of Drafting in the Renaissance 24 May - 1 June 2001 Florence and Vinci, Italy Organized by Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza |
|
MARGARET DALY DAVIS The wooden inlay decoration of the Sacristy: perspectival intarsie, pictorial intarsie Many of the exercises presented in Part IV of Piero's Libellus de quinque corporibus regularibus, a book on the measurement and representation of regular and irregular stereometrical bodies, concern, too, the measurement and representation of building parts -- columns, vaults, apses, domes and the like. The results of Piero's mathematical research in his Libellus, and in the earlier Trattato dell'Abaco as well, were applied some years later to his methods for drawing stereometric bodies and many architectural elements in the Prospectiva pingendi; the methods he had established there, in fact, had their greatest resonance in the architectural theory. At the same time, his ideas and methods were immediately taken up by designers of intarsia for the perspectival representation of single objects and scenographic views. The intarsiasts' simple stereometric designs were the basis for their virtuoso representations of all kinds of sacred and profane still-life objects. Many of the intarsia makers, who also were practiced in fabricating wooden architectural models, were or were to become architects; this is confirmed in Benedetto Dei's list of "maestri di prospettive" or intarsia makers in Florence. What has come down to us of Piero's stereometrical writings is certainly only a fraction of what he knew and produced and certainly among his most eager students must have been the intarsia designers. We know for one that the artist from Sansepolcro was "caro quanto fratello" to Lorenzo da Lendinara, and similarly, though we cannot connect him directly with Giovanni da Verona, Piero's theories were at the basis of his very elaborate intarsia. Similarly, Piero's rules that structured such paintings as his Flagellation in Urbino structured, too, contemporary scenographic intarsia. The examples of intarsia, in fact, in the choir at S. Francesco in Arezzo lead one to wonder if indeed he did not have a hand, even indirectly, in their elaboration. The intarsia panels in the sacristy of the Duomo are of two types: on the one hand there are those which represent sacred still-life objects behind the latticed open doors -- mostly books, but also sacred objects such as a chalice, mitre, and candlesticks. These follow from Piero's stereometric tradition. There is a subtle ability in the elaboration of the perspective representations though they differ distinctly from the very elaborate geometrical feats we know in the still-life objects found, for instance, in Federico da Montefeltro's studio in Urbino and in the works by Fra Giovanni in Verona. Beyond demonstrating the objects in correct perspective, the designer in the Florentine sacristy was concerned with showing his skills in representing in hard wood the undulating page of a book, or similarly, representing in wood a manuscript page with musical notes and written text in perspective as if in a painting. His only real tour de force, as it were, is found in the representation of a folded out stand with a candlestick and lighted candle. Even the classical mazzocchio of Piero della Francesca and Uccello, used again and again in wooden inlays, and used by Carpaccio as a kind of symbol of the unity of perspective and the study of architecture, is, in the version in the sacristy, simply more decorative variant of a garland. The second type
of intarsia in the sacristy is the perspectival, figural representation,
as a painting executed in wood. Vasari had included a chapter on wooden
inlay in his introduction to painting: |